|

(1898-1976)
Theories and approach
In his building designs and through clever use of modern materials
and technology, Alvar Aalto tried to capture ideas which reflected
elements like climate, landscape and culture. He combined continental
influences of modern architecture with nordic ideas from his Finnish
homeland. He believed that nature, not the machine, is the most
important model for architecture. “The architect’s task
is to make our life patterns more sympathetic,” he said.
Look at two different buildings by Aalto, the Villa
Mairea and the Piamio
Sanatorium, which are linked to from the thumbnail
images above.
Can you detect similarities in their design which reflect Aalto’s
approach?
What practical solutions does he present in the two buildings where
he attempts to combine nature and technology?
Theory and approach in example one
The Villa Mairea was built at
Noormarkku in Finland. Although it was very luxurious Aalto hoped
it would act as a showcase for quality design solutions that might
be adapted for future extensive housing programmes. This was typical
of the social dreams of post-war functionalist designers –
designers who believed that the form of a thing should be dictated
by its use.
Aalto developed his own humanist approach (a belief in human effort
and ingenuity) in which ideas of functionalism were combined with
the traditional Finnish peasant home designs. His designs were based
on the idea of humans, nature and art working in harmony.
The Villa Mairea design takes
into consideration two opposing themes – nature and culture,
and rustic and urban – with its primitive hut and the refined
villa. Aalto’s aim was to envelope the villa’s inhabitants
in nature and give them emotional comfort.
Consideration of possibilities
Between the Villa Mairea and its
nearest neighbours lies a hill covered in fir trees. Aalto linked
the interior of the building to its natural surrounding with: a
sun/rain canopy supported by tree-like pillars; a free-form swimming
pool; a traditional log sauna; materials like teak, spruce, slate
and brick, rough stone steps and grass roofs on concrete beams.
Aalto also tried to bring something of the flow of nature into
the villa. He broke up rectangular interior spaces with a curved
hall and stairs and developed rooms as continuous spaces. The choice
of construction and decorative materials helped enhance a flow of
movement. There were fabric walls, mixed use of teak, steel, plaster,
glass, black steel columns wrapped with rattan (to simulate peeling
bark) and birch strips. Colours were pale and in harmony with the
surrounding landscape.
Final outcome
The Villa Mairea was a two-storey,
flat-roofed building. Part of it was steel-framed, part of it built
with perforated bricks. It was built of the best and most select
materials. It was designed with beautiful form and proportion, and
provided comfort and an unusual closeness to nature.
Theory and approach in other designs
Sanatorium in Piamio (1929-33)
When Aalto was bed-ridden for a while he was sensitive to dazzling
lights, noises and draughts. He resolved to avoid them in his Piamio
Sanatorium.
Modernism was well-suited to sanatorium architecture. Before the
discovery of antibiotics, doctors treated tuberculosis with light,
air, sun and hygiene – the very factors modern architecture
considered important.
The building was characterised by a joyfulness usually quite foreign
to sanatoriums. Many aspects of its design integrated architecture
with nature – it was built on a beautiful pine heath and the
roof-level sun terrace had planters with fir trees said to give
off ozone which helped rehabilitate patients.
Inside, Aalto created a restful atmosphere by painting ceilings
darker than the walls to ensure lighting didn’t dazzle. Communal
spaces had windows facing different directions to make lighting
as varied as possible and day-room corners gave open views to the
surrounding garden and forest.
Furniture design
Piamio Chair
The Piamio Chair was designed
by Alvar Aalto for patients at the Piamio Sanatorium.
He claimed it helped patients breath better and was made in wood
rather than steel because wood is a warmer, more supple material.
It was made with bent laminated veneer, and despite its lack of
upholstery the springy seat afforded comfortable sitting.
The seat had a natural and unobtrusive form and was relatively
cheap to make in terms of materials (birch and plywood), technology
and time. Aalto’s design reflects his interest in mixing materials
and shapes. Look at the rectilinear forms and organic curves.
|